The Concept of «Co-Production» in the Context of Urban Governance
How to Cite
Eremeev S.G. The Concept of «Co-Production» in the Context of Urban Governance. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2019. Vol. 27. No. 4. P. 101-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v27i4.6593 (in Russ.).
Abstract
The paper attempts to interpret critically the concept of co-production in the context of urban governance and identifies the main trends and problems of citizen participation in the design and implementation of smart cities. The author concludes that despite the general awareness of the need for an active role of citizens in the development of smart cities, most smart city projects still retain a very narrow understanding of the role of citizens as simple information providers. Prospects for further conceptualizing the role of citizens in the implementation of the smart city are associated with an analysis of the substantive aspect of civic participation.
Keywords:
Smart City, co-creation, co-production, innovation, citizen participation, information and communication technologies
References
Berntzen L., Johannesen M.R., Odegard A. 2016. A Citizen-Centric Public Sector: Why Citizen Centricity Matters and How to Obtain It. – Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on AHPMTS. Rome: IARIA. P. 14-20.
Boonstra B., Boelens L. 2011. Self-organization in Urban Development: towards a New Perspective on Spatial Planning. – Urban Research & Practice. Vol. 4. Iss. 2. P. 99-122.
Castelnovo W. 2016. Citizens as Sensors / Information Providers in the Co-production of Smart City Services. – Proceedings of the 12th ITAIS. Italy: LUISS University Press. P. 51-62.
Eskelinen J., Robles A. G., Lindy I., Marsh J., Muente-Kunigami A. 2015. Citizen-Driven Innovation. A Guidebook for City Mayors and Public Administrators. 130 p. URL: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/629961467999380675/pdf/96634-WP-P147952-PUBLIC-Box391460B-Citizen-Driven-Innovation-Web.pdf (accessed 14.07.2019).
Hollands R.G. 2015. Critical Interventions into the Corporate Smart City. –Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. Vol. 8. Iss. 1. P. 61-77.
Horelli L., Saad-Sulonen J., Wallin S., Botero A. 2015. When Self-organization Intersects with Urban Planning: Two Cases from Helsinki. – Planning Practice & Research. Vol. 30. Iss. 3. P. 286-302.
Lim A., Malek J.A., Hussain M.Y., Tahir Z. 2018. Citizen Participation in Building Citizen-centric Smart Cities. – Malaysian Journal of Society and Space. Vol. 14. Is. 4. P. 42-53.
Lund D.H. 2017. Co-creation in Urban Governance: from Inclusion to Innovation. – Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration. Vol. Iss. 2. P. 27-41.
Saunders T., Baeck P. 2015. Rethinking Cities from the Ground up. 74 р. URL: https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/rethinking_smart_cities_from_the_ground_up_2015.pdf (accessed 14.07.2019).
Voorberg W., Bekkers V., Tummers L. 2014. Co-creation in Social
Innovation: Comparative Case-Study on the Influential Factors and Outcomes of Co-creation. Ottаwa: IRSPM.
Boonstra B., Boelens L. 2011. Self-organization in Urban Development: towards a New Perspective on Spatial Planning. – Urban Research & Practice. Vol. 4. Iss. 2. P. 99-122.
Castelnovo W. 2016. Citizens as Sensors / Information Providers in the Co-production of Smart City Services. – Proceedings of the 12th ITAIS. Italy: LUISS University Press. P. 51-62.
Eskelinen J., Robles A. G., Lindy I., Marsh J., Muente-Kunigami A. 2015. Citizen-Driven Innovation. A Guidebook for City Mayors and Public Administrators. 130 p. URL: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/629961467999380675/pdf/96634-WP-P147952-PUBLIC-Box391460B-Citizen-Driven-Innovation-Web.pdf (accessed 14.07.2019).
Hollands R.G. 2015. Critical Interventions into the Corporate Smart City. –Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. Vol. 8. Iss. 1. P. 61-77.
Horelli L., Saad-Sulonen J., Wallin S., Botero A. 2015. When Self-organization Intersects with Urban Planning: Two Cases from Helsinki. – Planning Practice & Research. Vol. 30. Iss. 3. P. 286-302.
Lim A., Malek J.A., Hussain M.Y., Tahir Z. 2018. Citizen Participation in Building Citizen-centric Smart Cities. – Malaysian Journal of Society and Space. Vol. 14. Is. 4. P. 42-53.
Lund D.H. 2017. Co-creation in Urban Governance: from Inclusion to Innovation. – Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration. Vol. Iss. 2. P. 27-41.
Saunders T., Baeck P. 2015. Rethinking Cities from the Ground up. 74 р. URL: https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/rethinking_smart_cities_from_the_ground_up_2015.pdf (accessed 14.07.2019).
Voorberg W., Bekkers V., Tummers L. 2014. Co-creation in Social
Innovation: Comparative Case-Study on the Influential Factors and Outcomes of Co-creation. Ottаwa: IRSPM.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Eremeev, S. G. (2019). The Concept of «Co-Production» in the Context of Urban Governance. Vlast’ (The Authority), 27(4), 101-105. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v27i4.6593
Issue
Section
POLITICAL PROCESSES AND PRACTICES
Following the submission of the manuscript to the Publisher, the author binds oneself not to publish it somewhere else without permission of the Publisher.
