Партисипаторная государственная управляемость: платформы и сотрудничество
Для цитирования
Сморгунов Л. В. Партисипаторная государственная управляемость: платформы и сотрудничество // Власть. 2019. Том 27. № 5. С. 9-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v27i5.6712
Аннотация
В статье критически рассматривается потенциал идеи государства как платформы. Автор выделяет технократический, потребительский и политический подходы к реализации идеи на практике, производит оценку российской идеи государства как платформы, рассматривает контекстуальные условия перехода к платформам, дает их определение, а также подходы к классификации видов. В статье подчеркивается значение обеспечения государственной управляемости посредством сотрудничества граждан, бизнеса, НКО и государства на формируемых технологических платформах. Партисипаторная государственная управляемость является особым сетевым эффектом многостороннего взаимодействия. Критика потребительского подхода к государству как платформе учитывает исчерпаемость концепции нового государственного менеджмента и необходимость учета социально-политического содержания платформ.
Ключевые слова:
партисипаторная государственная управляемость, платформы, государство как платформа, сотрудничество
Литература
Петров М., Буров В., Шклярук М., Шаров А. 2018. Государство как платформа. (Кибер)государство для цифровой экономики. Цифровая трансформация. М.: Центр стратегических разработок. 52 с.
Сморгунов Л.В. 2007. От электронного государства к электронному правлению: смена парадигмы. – Политическая наука. № 4. C. 20-49.
Al-Ani A. 2017. Government as a Platform: Services, Participation and Policies. – Digital Transformation in Journalism and News Media. Media Business and Innovation (ed. by M. Friedrichsen, Y. Kamalipour). Cham.: Springer. P. 179-196.
Asgarkhani M. 2007. The Reality of Social Inclusion through Digital Government. – Journal of Technology in Human Services. Vol. 25. No. 1-2. P. 127-146.
Arens Y., Callan J., Dawes Sh.S., Fountain J., Hovy E., Marchionini G. 2003. Cyberinfrastructure and Digital Government. URL: https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/files/publication/JF_cyberinfrastructure.pdf (accessed 23.08.2019).
Aleixo C., Nunes M., Isaias P. 2012. Usability and Digital Inclusion: Standards and Guidelines. – International Journal of Public Administration. Vol. 35. No. 3. P. 221-239.
Castelnovo W., Sorrentino M. 2017. The Digital Government Imperative: a Context-Aware Perspective. – Public Management Review. Vol. 20. No. 5. P. 709-725.
Chadwick A., May C. 2003. Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: «E-Government» in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. – Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 271-300.
Chung Ch.-S. 2017. From Electronic Government to Platform Government. – Journal of Platform Technology. Vol. 5. No. 3. P. 3-10.
Citizen Service Platform. Strategies to Transform Government in the 2.0 World. Microsoft. 2010. 14 p.
Dawes S., Gregg V., Agouris P. 2004. Digital Government Research: Investigations at the Crossroads of Social and Information Science. – Social Science Computer Review. Vol. 22. No. 1. P. 5-10.
Digital Government 2020. Prospects for Russia. 2016. URL: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/562371467117654718/pdf/105318-WP-PUBLIC-Digital-Government-2020.pdf (accessed 17.04.2019).
Digital Government Strategies for Transforming Public Services in the Welfare Areas: OECD comparative study. 2016. OECD. 63 p.
Driving Democracy Forward. Year in Review 2018. 2019. Washington, DC: OGP. 17 p.
Dugdale A., Daly A., Papandrea F., Maley M. 2005. Accessing E-government: Challenges for Citizens and Organizations. – International Review of Administrative Sciences. Vol. 71. No. 1. P. 109-118.
E-Government in Support of Sustainable Development: United Nations E-Government Survey 2016. N.Y. United Nations. 2016.
Eriksson K., Vogt H. 2013. On Self-service Democracy: Configurations of Individualizing Governance and Self-directed Citizenship. – European Journal of Social Theory. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 153-173.
Four Platforms for Governments. – Accenture. 2018. URL: https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/public-service/four-platforms-for-government (accessed 05.05.2019).
Gil-Garcia J.R., Dawes Sh.S., Pardo T.A. 2018. Digital Government and Public Management Research: Finding the Crossroads. – Public Management Review. Vol. 20. No. 5. P. 633-646.
Gillespie T. 2010. The Politics of ‘Platforms’. – New Media & Society. Vol. 12. No. 3. P. 347-364.
Gillespie T. 2018. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Modernization, and the Hidden Decisions that Shape Social Media. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. 296 p.
Gorwa R. 2019. What is Platform Governance? – Information, Communication and Society. Vol. 22. No. 6. P. 854-871.
Government as a Platform: Report 2018. URL: https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/public-service/government-as-a-platform (accessed 05.05.2019).
Jang S.H. 2016. A Comparative Study on the Development of K-MOOC Platform. – Journal of Platform Technology. Vol. 4. No. 1. P. 33-38.
Knox C. 2013. Public Administrators’ Use of Social Media Platforms: Overcoming the Legitimacy Dilemma? – Administration and Society. Vol. 20. No. 10. P. 3-20.
Margetts H., Naumann A. 2017. Government as a Platform: What Can Estonia Show the World? 41 р. URL: politics.ox.ac.uk/materials/publications/16061/government-as-a-platform.pdf (accessed 20.08.2019).
O’Reilly T. 2010. Government as a Platform. – Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice (ed. by D. Lathrop, L. Ruma). Sebastopol, Calif.: O’Reilly Media. P. 11-40.
Сморгунов Л.В. 2007. От электронного государства к электронному правлению: смена парадигмы. – Политическая наука. № 4. C. 20-49.
Al-Ani A. 2017. Government as a Platform: Services, Participation and Policies. – Digital Transformation in Journalism and News Media. Media Business and Innovation (ed. by M. Friedrichsen, Y. Kamalipour). Cham.: Springer. P. 179-196.
Asgarkhani M. 2007. The Reality of Social Inclusion through Digital Government. – Journal of Technology in Human Services. Vol. 25. No. 1-2. P. 127-146.
Arens Y., Callan J., Dawes Sh.S., Fountain J., Hovy E., Marchionini G. 2003. Cyberinfrastructure and Digital Government. URL: https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/files/publication/JF_cyberinfrastructure.pdf (accessed 23.08.2019).
Aleixo C., Nunes M., Isaias P. 2012. Usability and Digital Inclusion: Standards and Guidelines. – International Journal of Public Administration. Vol. 35. No. 3. P. 221-239.
Castelnovo W., Sorrentino M. 2017. The Digital Government Imperative: a Context-Aware Perspective. – Public Management Review. Vol. 20. No. 5. P. 709-725.
Chadwick A., May C. 2003. Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: «E-Government» in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. – Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 271-300.
Chung Ch.-S. 2017. From Electronic Government to Platform Government. – Journal of Platform Technology. Vol. 5. No. 3. P. 3-10.
Citizen Service Platform. Strategies to Transform Government in the 2.0 World. Microsoft. 2010. 14 p.
Dawes S., Gregg V., Agouris P. 2004. Digital Government Research: Investigations at the Crossroads of Social and Information Science. – Social Science Computer Review. Vol. 22. No. 1. P. 5-10.
Digital Government 2020. Prospects for Russia. 2016. URL: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/562371467117654718/pdf/105318-WP-PUBLIC-Digital-Government-2020.pdf (accessed 17.04.2019).
Digital Government Strategies for Transforming Public Services in the Welfare Areas: OECD comparative study. 2016. OECD. 63 p.
Driving Democracy Forward. Year in Review 2018. 2019. Washington, DC: OGP. 17 p.
Dugdale A., Daly A., Papandrea F., Maley M. 2005. Accessing E-government: Challenges for Citizens and Organizations. – International Review of Administrative Sciences. Vol. 71. No. 1. P. 109-118.
E-Government in Support of Sustainable Development: United Nations E-Government Survey 2016. N.Y. United Nations. 2016.
Eriksson K., Vogt H. 2013. On Self-service Democracy: Configurations of Individualizing Governance and Self-directed Citizenship. – European Journal of Social Theory. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 153-173.
Four Platforms for Governments. – Accenture. 2018. URL: https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/public-service/four-platforms-for-government (accessed 05.05.2019).
Gil-Garcia J.R., Dawes Sh.S., Pardo T.A. 2018. Digital Government and Public Management Research: Finding the Crossroads. – Public Management Review. Vol. 20. No. 5. P. 633-646.
Gillespie T. 2010. The Politics of ‘Platforms’. – New Media & Society. Vol. 12. No. 3. P. 347-364.
Gillespie T. 2018. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Modernization, and the Hidden Decisions that Shape Social Media. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. 296 p.
Gorwa R. 2019. What is Platform Governance? – Information, Communication and Society. Vol. 22. No. 6. P. 854-871.
Government as a Platform: Report 2018. URL: https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/public-service/government-as-a-platform (accessed 05.05.2019).
Jang S.H. 2016. A Comparative Study on the Development of K-MOOC Platform. – Journal of Platform Technology. Vol. 4. No. 1. P. 33-38.
Knox C. 2013. Public Administrators’ Use of Social Media Platforms: Overcoming the Legitimacy Dilemma? – Administration and Society. Vol. 20. No. 10. P. 3-20.
Margetts H., Naumann A. 2017. Government as a Platform: What Can Estonia Show the World? 41 р. URL: politics.ox.ac.uk/materials/publications/16061/government-as-a-platform.pdf (accessed 20.08.2019).
O’Reilly T. 2010. Government as a Platform. – Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice (ed. by D. Lathrop, L. Ruma). Sebastopol, Calif.: O’Reilly Media. P. 11-40.
Форматы цитирования
Другие форматы цитирования:
APA
Сморгунов, Л. В. (2019). Партисипаторная государственная управляемость: платформы и сотрудничество. Власть, 27(5), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v27i5.6712
Выпуск
Раздел
ПОЛИТИЧЕСКИЕ ПРОЦЕССЫ И ПРАКТИКИ
Представляя в Редакцию рукопись автор выражает согласие со всеми пунктами настоящего лицензионного договора.
