Migration as a Factor of the Growth of Religious Conflict Potential (on the Example of Europe): the Socio-Philosophical Approach
Research Article
How to Cite
Arshin K.V. Migration as a Factor of the Growth of Religious Conflict Potential (on the Example of Europe): the Socio-Philosophical Approach. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2020. Vol. 28. No. 6. P. 162-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v28i6.7761 (in Russ.).
Abstract
In recent years, one can observe at least a dozen conflicts in the world, which either are waged by representatives of various faiths, or are interpreted as conflicts on religious grounds. These are the civil war in Yemen, the conflicts in the Indian states of Assam, Nagaland and Manipur, and the conflict in Myanmar between Arakanese Buddhists and Rohingya Muslims. Some of these conflicts are interpreted as a clash between the indigenous people and migrants. However, the religious factor also plays a significant role. In the context of increasing migration activity, it is possible to expect an increase in inter-religious conflict, based on the migration factor. The solution to this problem is seen in the implementation of the project of constitutional patriotism.
Keywords:
migration; confession; conflict; Islam; Europe; USA; civilization; radicalism; identity
References
Zorin V.Yu. 2019. Migratsionnaya politika mezhdu pravami cheloveka i bezopasnost'yu. – Nauka. Obshchestvo. Oborona. URL: https://www.noo-journal.ru/migratsiya-demografiya/zorin-v-migratsiya/ (accessed 27.10.2020). (RUS.)
Sheffler S. 2007. Immigratsiya i znachenie kul'tury. – Prognozis. № 1(9). S. 77-102. (RUS.)
Khabermas Yu. 2001. Vovlechenie drugogo. Ocherki politicheskoi teorii. SPb: Nauka. 417 s. (RUS.)
Khantington S. 2003. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsii. M.: AST. 603 s. (RUS.)
Fukuyama F. 2019. Identichnost': stremlenie k priznaniyu i politika nepriyatiya. M.: Al'pina-Pablisher. 256 s. (RUS.)
Esh T.G. 2007. Islam v Evrope. – Prognozis. № 1(9). S. 186-199. (RUS.)
Russett B.M., Oneal J.R., Cox M. 2000. Clash of Civilizations, or Realism and Liberalism Déjà Vu? Some Evidence. – Journal of Peace Research. Vol. 37. Is. 5. P. 583-608.
Sen A. 1999. Democracy as a Universal Value. – Journal of Democracy. Vol. 10. Is. 3. P. 3-17.
Sheffler S. 2007. Immigratsiya i znachenie kul'tury. – Prognozis. № 1(9). S. 77-102. (RUS.)
Khabermas Yu. 2001. Vovlechenie drugogo. Ocherki politicheskoi teorii. SPb: Nauka. 417 s. (RUS.)
Khantington S. 2003. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsii. M.: AST. 603 s. (RUS.)
Fukuyama F. 2019. Identichnost': stremlenie k priznaniyu i politika nepriyatiya. M.: Al'pina-Pablisher. 256 s. (RUS.)
Esh T.G. 2007. Islam v Evrope. – Prognozis. № 1(9). S. 186-199. (RUS.)
Russett B.M., Oneal J.R., Cox M. 2000. Clash of Civilizations, or Realism and Liberalism Déjà Vu? Some Evidence. – Journal of Peace Research. Vol. 37. Is. 5. P. 583-608.
Sen A. 1999. Democracy as a Universal Value. – Journal of Democracy. Vol. 10. Is. 3. P. 3-17.
Article
Received: 23.12.2020
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Arshin, K. V. (2020). Migration as a Factor of the Growth of Religious Conflict Potential (on the Example of Europe): the Socio-Philosophical Approach. Vlast’ (The Authority), 28(6), 162-167. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v28i6.7761
Issue
Section
EXPERTISE
Following the submission of the manuscript to the Publisher, the author binds oneself not to publish it somewhere else without permission of the Publisher.
