Ethnicity and Religiosity as Selection Criteria of Marriage Partner among the Modern Youth
Research Article
How to Cite
Sedova A.P., Habatullina R.R., Sizonenko S.L. Ethnicity and Religiosity as Selection Criteria of Marriage Partner among the Modern Youth. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2021. Vol. 29. No. 1. P. 310-316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v29i1.7961 (in Russ.).
Abstract
The article examines the role of sociocultural factors in the marriage and family attitudes of modern youth. The authors present the results of an intelligence Internet survey showing the importance of such criteria for marriage choice as the ethnic and religious identity of a potential partner. All interviewed young people pointed to the tolerant attitude towards people of another religion and ethnicity, but the majority stated their desire to choose a life partner from “their circle” – ethnos and confession. According to the authors, studies on these issues among the youth, do not allow to obtain the objective data. The reason lies in the characteristics of the young audience itself. It all depends on how seriously young people refers to the problematic question, whether its significance is understood, and whether there is a desire to sincerely answer.
Keywords:
ethnicity; nationality; youth; religion; marriage choice; intermarriage
References
Abalakina M.A., Ageev V.S. 1989. Romanticheskaya lyubov', polorolevye stereotipy i dinamika predbrachnykh otnoshenii. Ideologicheskie i psikhologicheskie aspekty issledovaniya massovogo soznaniya. M.: INION. S. 112-185. (RUS.)
Abdrakhmanov D.M., Sizonenko Z.L., Yuldasheva O.N. 2011. Sotsial'nye tekhnologii ukrepleniya mezhnatsional'nogo soglasiya: monografiya. Ufa: Dialog. 244 s. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22974971 (accessed 25.04.2020). (RUS.)
Barakatova D.A. 2013. Etnopsikhologiya kak nauka. PEM: Psychology. Educology.Medicine.№1-1. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/etnopsihologiya-kak-nauka (accessed 12.10.2020). (RUS.)
Burkhanova F.B. 2011. Sozdanie sem'i v sovremennykh usloviyakh. – Chelovecheskii kapital. № 10. S. 104–109. (RUS.)
Guboglo M. 2006. Etnosotsiologiya i etnopolitologiya v orbite sotsiologicheskogo znaniya. Rusin. №3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/etnosotsiologiya-i-etnopolitologiya-v-orbite-sotsiologicheskogo-znaniya (accessed 12.10.2020). (RUS.)
Bekker G.S. 2003. Chelovecheskoe povedenie: ekonomicheskii podkhod. Izbrannye trudy po ekonomicheskoi teorii: per. s angl. Sostavitel', nauch. red., poslesl. R.I. Kapelyushnikov / predisl. M.I. Levin. M.: GU VShE. 673 s. (RUS.)
Bikmetov E.Yu., Luk'yanov A.V. 2019. Dukhovnyi, sotsiokul'turnyi i yazykovoi kontekst razvitiya nauchnogo znaniya: monografiya. Ufa: UGATU. 225 s. (RUS.)
Volkova A.N. 2008. Psikhologicheskoe konsul'tirovanie semeinykh konfliktov. Vestnik LGU im. A.S. Pushkina. №2 (Psikhologiya). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/psihologicheskoe-konsultirovanie-semeynyh-konfliktov (accessed: 28.05.2020). (RUS.)
Drobizheva L.M. 1991. Etnicheskoe samosoznanie russkikh v sovremennykh usloviyakh: ideologiya i praktika. Sovetskaya etnografiya. № 1. S.3-13. (RUS.)
Il'in E.P. 2003. Differentsial'naya psikhofiziologiya muzhchiny i zhenshchiny. SPb.: Piter. 544 s. (RUS.)
Kitova D.A., Balova D.Yu. 2011. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti predstavlenii studentov o sozdanii sem'i. Prikladnaya psikhologiya i psikhoanaliz. Elektron.nauch. zhurn., № 1. URL: http://ppip.idnk.ru, (accessed: 02.05.2012). (RUS.)
Kozlov G.A. 1999. Modeli brachnogo rynka v demograficheskom modelirovanii. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody. № 4. S. 64–77. (RUS.)
Lisovskii V.T. 1996. Sotsiologiya molodezhi. S.-Pb.: Sankt-Peterburgskii universitet. 361 s. (RUS.)
Rostovskaya T.K., Shimanovskaya Ya.V. 2017. Brachno-semeinye otnosheniya sovremennoi molodezhi. Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo. №3 (252). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/brachno-semeynye-otnosheniya-sovremennoy-molodezhi (accessed: 11.03.2020). (RUS.)
Roshchin S.Yu., Roshchina Ya.M. 2006. Brachnyi rynok v Rossii: vybor partnera i faktory uspekha. M.: GU VShE. URL: https://www.hse.ru/data/2010/05/05/1216427460/WP4_2006_04.pdf (accessed: 06.07.2020). (RUS.)
Sizonenko Z.L. 2007. Mezhnatsional'naya sem'ya v krupnom gorode. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 2. S. 140–142. (RUS.)
Rossiyane zainteresovalis' izucheniem svoego roda. Rossiiskaya gazeta – Federal'nyi vypusk. № 210(7078). URL: https://rg.ru/2016/09/18/semi-gotovy-tratit-ogromnye-dengi-chtoby-uznat-o-svoih-predkah.html (accessed 01.12.2020). (RUS.)
Abdrakhmanov D.M., Sizonenko Z.L., Yuldasheva O.N. 2011. Sotsial'nye tekhnologii ukrepleniya mezhnatsional'nogo soglasiya: monografiya. Ufa: Dialog. 244 s. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22974971 (accessed 25.04.2020). (RUS.)
Barakatova D.A. 2013. Etnopsikhologiya kak nauka. PEM: Psychology. Educology.Medicine.№1-1. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/etnopsihologiya-kak-nauka (accessed 12.10.2020). (RUS.)
Burkhanova F.B. 2011. Sozdanie sem'i v sovremennykh usloviyakh. – Chelovecheskii kapital. № 10. S. 104–109. (RUS.)
Guboglo M. 2006. Etnosotsiologiya i etnopolitologiya v orbite sotsiologicheskogo znaniya. Rusin. №3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/etnosotsiologiya-i-etnopolitologiya-v-orbite-sotsiologicheskogo-znaniya (accessed 12.10.2020). (RUS.)
Bekker G.S. 2003. Chelovecheskoe povedenie: ekonomicheskii podkhod. Izbrannye trudy po ekonomicheskoi teorii: per. s angl. Sostavitel', nauch. red., poslesl. R.I. Kapelyushnikov / predisl. M.I. Levin. M.: GU VShE. 673 s. (RUS.)
Bikmetov E.Yu., Luk'yanov A.V. 2019. Dukhovnyi, sotsiokul'turnyi i yazykovoi kontekst razvitiya nauchnogo znaniya: monografiya. Ufa: UGATU. 225 s. (RUS.)
Volkova A.N. 2008. Psikhologicheskoe konsul'tirovanie semeinykh konfliktov. Vestnik LGU im. A.S. Pushkina. №2 (Psikhologiya). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/psihologicheskoe-konsultirovanie-semeynyh-konfliktov (accessed: 28.05.2020). (RUS.)
Drobizheva L.M. 1991. Etnicheskoe samosoznanie russkikh v sovremennykh usloviyakh: ideologiya i praktika. Sovetskaya etnografiya. № 1. S.3-13. (RUS.)
Il'in E.P. 2003. Differentsial'naya psikhofiziologiya muzhchiny i zhenshchiny. SPb.: Piter. 544 s. (RUS.)
Kitova D.A., Balova D.Yu. 2011. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti predstavlenii studentov o sozdanii sem'i. Prikladnaya psikhologiya i psikhoanaliz. Elektron.nauch. zhurn., № 1. URL: http://ppip.idnk.ru, (accessed: 02.05.2012). (RUS.)
Kozlov G.A. 1999. Modeli brachnogo rynka v demograficheskom modelirovanii. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody. № 4. S. 64–77. (RUS.)
Lisovskii V.T. 1996. Sotsiologiya molodezhi. S.-Pb.: Sankt-Peterburgskii universitet. 361 s. (RUS.)
Rostovskaya T.K., Shimanovskaya Ya.V. 2017. Brachno-semeinye otnosheniya sovremennoi molodezhi. Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo. №3 (252). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/brachno-semeynye-otnosheniya-sovremennoy-molodezhi (accessed: 11.03.2020). (RUS.)
Roshchin S.Yu., Roshchina Ya.M. 2006. Brachnyi rynok v Rossii: vybor partnera i faktory uspekha. M.: GU VShE. URL: https://www.hse.ru/data/2010/05/05/1216427460/WP4_2006_04.pdf (accessed: 06.07.2020). (RUS.)
Sizonenko Z.L. 2007. Mezhnatsional'naya sem'ya v krupnom gorode. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 2. S. 140–142. (RUS.)
Rossiyane zainteresovalis' izucheniem svoego roda. Rossiiskaya gazeta – Federal'nyi vypusk. № 210(7078). URL: https://rg.ru/2016/09/18/semi-gotovy-tratit-ogromnye-dengi-chtoby-uznat-o-svoih-predkah.html (accessed 01.12.2020). (RUS.)
Article
Received: 29.03.2021
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Sedova, A. P., Habatullina, R. R., & Sizonenko, S. L. (2021). Ethnicity and Religiosity as Selection Criteria of Marriage Partner among the Modern Youth. Vlast’ (The Authority), 29(1), 310-316. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v29i1.7961
Issue
Section
ARTICLES OF THE WINNERS OF THE ALL-RUSSIAN STUDENT WORK COMPETITION
Following the submission of the manuscript to the Publisher, the author binds oneself not to publish it somewhere else without permission of the Publisher.
