Analysis of Intergenerational Gaps and Contradictions on the Example of the United States
Research Article
How to Cite
Osinina D.D. Analysis of Intergenerational Gaps and Contradictions on the Example of the United States. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2021. Vol. 29. No. 6. P. 278-285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v29i6.8736 (in Russ.).
Abstract
The problem of «fathers» and «children» is relevant at all times, it has been given a large place in literature, music, sociology and psychology. However, since the 1950s (the period of Vietnam War, which divided American society into two camps – those who supported and opposed the country's foreign policy; among them are young people who appealed to the left movement), the topic of intergenerational relations is actively discussed in political sciences, and the relations between generations determine the level of society’s consolidation. Today, rapidly changing norms of behavior and value attitudes once again is the cause of contradictions between generations, since the speed and desire for their implementation differ among representatives of different generations.
Keywords:
intergenerational gaps; intergenerational contradictions; generational theory; values; USA
References
Bestaeva E.V. 2020. Sotsiolingvisticheskiĭ aspekt razvitiya sovremennykh tsifrovykh tekhnologiĭ. Preimushchestva i riski. – Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. № 4. S. 80-84. (RUS.)
Dubin B.V. 1995. Sotsial'nyi status, kul'turnyi kapital, tsennostnyi vybor: mezhpokolencheskaya reproduktsiya i razryv pokolenii. – Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny. URL: https://clck.ru/JYtaH (accessed 28.11.2021). (RUS.)
Dubin B.V. 2002. Pokolenie: sotsiologicheskie granitsy ponyatiya. Vyp. 1. S. 14-18. URL: http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/534/984/1219/03dubin-11-15.pdf (accessed 28.11.2021). (RUS.)
Zolotukhina M. 2014. Vzroslenie po-amerikanski: smena vekh. – Otechestvennye zapiski. № 5(62). S. 117-136. (RUS.)
Il'in G.L. 2017. Sistemy doshkol'nogo obrazovaniya v evropeiskikh, aziatskikh i amerikanskikh stranakh: sravnitel'nyi analiz. M.: Izd-vo MPGU. 62 s. (RUS.)
Isaeva A. 2021. Oni i my: kak vospityvayut detei v SShA i v Rossii. – Royal Cheese. URL: https://clck.ru/XwJXy (accessed 28.11.2021). (RUS.)
Kazakov M.M. Plyusy i minusy amerikanskoi sistemy obrazovaniya i vospitaniya. URL: http://mmkaz.narod.ru/publ/edu_usa.htm (accessed 28.11.2021). (RUS.)
Kir'yanova O.G. 1987. Krizis amerikanskoi sem'i. 2-e izd., dop. M.: Pedagogika. 240 s. (RUS.)
Makfol M. 2013. Vospitanie detei v SShA: stat'ya eks-posla SShA v RF. URL: https://echo.msk.ru/blog/mcfaul/1098106-echo/ (accessed 28.11.2021). (RUS.)
Mangeim K. 1998. Problema pokolenii. – Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. № 2(30). S. 7-47. (RUS.)
Prikhozhan A., Tolstykh N. 2016. Psikhologiya podrostkovogo vozrasta: uchebnik i praktikum dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata. M.: Yurait. 406 s. (RUS.)
Sadykova Kh.N. 2016. Sotsiokul'turnaya determinatsiya preemstvennosti v mezhpokolencheskom vzaimodeistvii (na primere naseleniya Tyumenskoi oblasti): dis. … k.sots.n. Tyumen'. 239 s. (RUS.)
Tyurikov A.G., Bol'shunov A.Ya. 2019. Informatsionnye tekhnologii kak sotsial'nyi vyzov XXI veka. – Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. № 2. S. 6-10. (RUS.)
Shanin T. 2005. Istoriya pokolenii i pokolencheskaya istoriya Rossii. – Chelovek. Soobshchestvo. Upravlenie. № 3. S. 6-25. (RUS.)
Shatilov A.B. 2021. Deyatel'nost' organov gosudarstvennoi vlasti Rossiiskoi Federatsii po formirovaniyu istoricheskikh predstavleniĭ studencheskoi molodezhi v postsovetskii period. – Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. № 3. S. 15-26. (RUS.)
Dubin B.V. 1995. Sotsial'nyi status, kul'turnyi kapital, tsennostnyi vybor: mezhpokolencheskaya reproduktsiya i razryv pokolenii. – Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny. URL: https://clck.ru/JYtaH (accessed 28.11.2021). (RUS.)
Dubin B.V. 2002. Pokolenie: sotsiologicheskie granitsy ponyatiya. Vyp. 1. S. 14-18. URL: http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/534/984/1219/03dubin-11-15.pdf (accessed 28.11.2021). (RUS.)
Zolotukhina M. 2014. Vzroslenie po-amerikanski: smena vekh. – Otechestvennye zapiski. № 5(62). S. 117-136. (RUS.)
Il'in G.L. 2017. Sistemy doshkol'nogo obrazovaniya v evropeiskikh, aziatskikh i amerikanskikh stranakh: sravnitel'nyi analiz. M.: Izd-vo MPGU. 62 s. (RUS.)
Isaeva A. 2021. Oni i my: kak vospityvayut detei v SShA i v Rossii. – Royal Cheese. URL: https://clck.ru/XwJXy (accessed 28.11.2021). (RUS.)
Kazakov M.M. Plyusy i minusy amerikanskoi sistemy obrazovaniya i vospitaniya. URL: http://mmkaz.narod.ru/publ/edu_usa.htm (accessed 28.11.2021). (RUS.)
Kir'yanova O.G. 1987. Krizis amerikanskoi sem'i. 2-e izd., dop. M.: Pedagogika. 240 s. (RUS.)
Makfol M. 2013. Vospitanie detei v SShA: stat'ya eks-posla SShA v RF. URL: https://echo.msk.ru/blog/mcfaul/1098106-echo/ (accessed 28.11.2021). (RUS.)
Mangeim K. 1998. Problema pokolenii. – Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. № 2(30). S. 7-47. (RUS.)
Prikhozhan A., Tolstykh N. 2016. Psikhologiya podrostkovogo vozrasta: uchebnik i praktikum dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata. M.: Yurait. 406 s. (RUS.)
Sadykova Kh.N. 2016. Sotsiokul'turnaya determinatsiya preemstvennosti v mezhpokolencheskom vzaimodeistvii (na primere naseleniya Tyumenskoi oblasti): dis. … k.sots.n. Tyumen'. 239 s. (RUS.)
Tyurikov A.G., Bol'shunov A.Ya. 2019. Informatsionnye tekhnologii kak sotsial'nyi vyzov XXI veka. – Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. № 2. S. 6-10. (RUS.)
Shanin T. 2005. Istoriya pokolenii i pokolencheskaya istoriya Rossii. – Chelovek. Soobshchestvo. Upravlenie. № 3. S. 6-25. (RUS.)
Shatilov A.B. 2021. Deyatel'nost' organov gosudarstvennoi vlasti Rossiiskoi Federatsii po formirovaniyu istoricheskikh predstavleniĭ studencheskoi molodezhi v postsovetskii period. – Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. № 3. S. 15-26. (RUS.)
Article
Received: 23.12.2021
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Osinina, D. D. (2021). Analysis of Intergenerational Gaps and Contradictions on the Example of the United States. Vlast’ (The Authority), 29(6), 278-285. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v29i6.8736
Issue
Section
FOCUS ON POLITICS
Following the submission of the manuscript to the Publisher, the author binds oneself not to publish it somewhere else without permission of the Publisher.