Differentiation of Types of Public Participation in Social Research

Research Article
  • Roman Vasilyevich Parma Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation rvparma@mail.ru
    Elibrary Author_id 919176
How to Cite
Parma R.V. Differentiation of Types of Public Participation in Social Research. Vlast’ (The Authority). 2022. Vol. 30. No. 5. P. 46-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v30i5.9236 (in Russ.).

Abstract

The article discusses approaches to the allocation of various types of public participation. Based on the field of activity, public participation is divided into political and non-political activity. Activity lines allow classifying public participation according to certain activities. The scale of actions sets levels of public participation. Various forms of public participation allow subdividing actions into certain activities. Measuring the intensity of social activity focuses on the efforts of participants to achieve the goal. The nature of public participation lies in the distribution of activity, based on the conventionality and radical nature of actions.
Keywords:
public participation; civic activism; social movements; protest moods; political mobilization

Author Biography

Roman Vasilyevich Parma, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Cand.Sci. (Pol.Sci.), Associate Professor of the Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences and Mass Communication

References

Beksheneva A.A., Yagodka N.N. 2020. Politicheskaya i nepoliticheskaya formy uchastiya grazhdan v obshchestvennoi zhizni Rossii. – Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Ser. Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal'noe upravlenie. № 1(7). S. 25-35. (RUS.)



Evlegina A.M. 2016. Grazhdanskoe uchastie: Aktual'nye voprosy soderzhaniya i tipologii. – Diskussiya. № 7(70). S. 66-70. (RUS.)



Kruglov M.S. 2014. Sovremennye formy grazhdanskoi aktivnosti v politicheskom protsesse Rossiiskoi Federatsii. – Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. № 3. S. 233-236. (RUS.)



Nikovskaya L.I., Skalaban I.A. 2017. Grazhdanskoe uchastie: osobennosti diskursa i tendentsii real'nogo razvitiya. – Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. № 6. S. 43-49. (RUS.)



Parma R.V. 2021. Obshchestvennyi aktivizm rossiiskikh grazhdan v oflain- i onlain-prostranstvakh. – Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny. № 6. S. 145-170. (RUS.)



Patrushev S.V. 2011. Grazhdanskaya aktivnost' kak faktor modernizatsii. – Modernizatsiya i politika v KhKhI veke (otv. red. Yu.S. Oganis'yan). M.: ROSSPEN . S. 262-275. (RUS.)



Pod"yachev K.V. Osnovnye formy grazhdanskogo uchastiya v usloviyakh sovremennoi Rossii. – Elektronnaya biblioteka «Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo». 15 s. URL: https://www.civisbook––.ru/files/File/Podyachev_osn.pdf (accessed 27.09.2022). (RUS.)



Sedova N.N. 2014. Grazhdanskii aktivizm v sovremennoi Rossii: formaty, faktory, sotsial'naya baza. – Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal. № 2. S. 48-71. (RUS.)



Trotsuk I.V., Savel'eva E.A. 2017. Struktura rossiiskogo internet-soobshchestva po kriteriyu motivov i vidov grazhdanskoi aktivnosti. – Zbornik radova Filozofskog fakulteta u Prishtini. Vol. LVII. P. 301-321.



Deric Sh. 2011. Political Sociology: Oppression, Resistance, and the State. California: Pine Forge Press. 248 p.



Harrebye S. 2011. Global Civil Society and International Summits: New Labels for Different Types of Activism at the COP15. – Journal of Civil Society. Vol. 4. No. 7. P. 407-426.



Milosevic-Dordevic J.S., Zezelj I.L. 2017. Civic Activism Online: Making Young People Dormant or More Active in Real Life? – Computers in Human Behavior. Vol. 70. P. 113-118.



Preece J., Shneiderman B. 2009. The Reader-to-Leader Framework: Motivating Technology-mediated Social Participation. – AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 13-32.
Article

Received: 26.10.2022

Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Parma, R. V. (2022). Differentiation of Types of Public Participation in Social Research. Vlast’ (The Authority), 30(5), 46-52. https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v30i5.9236
Section
POLITICAL PROCESSES AND PRACTICES