Poverty of Families with Children: Problems of Definition and Measurement, Regional Characteristics

  • V. V. Yelizarov Lomonosov Moscow State University elizarovvv@gmail.com
  • A. L. Sinitsa Lomonosov Moscow State University sinitsa@econ.msu.ru
How to Cite
Yelizarov V.V., Sinitsa A.L. Poverty of Families with Children: Problems of Definition and Measurement, Regional Characteristics. Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2018. Vol. 14. No. 2. P. 24-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/1999-9836-2018-10012 (in Russ.).

Abstract

The Object of the Study. Families with children.The Subject of the Study. The poverty of families with children.The Purpose of the Study. Studying of the characteristics and the ability to measure the poverty level of families with children, at the regional level in particular.The Main Provisions of the Article. The article deals with devoted to the methodological aspects of the poverty of families with children and the peculiarities of its study in recent decades. The standard of living of families and the poverty of families with children have traditionally been considered as socioeconomic problems, and therefore the tasks of reducing poverty and cutting the income deficit have been formulated as tasks within the framework of social policy, taking into account the constraints imposed by resource opportunities. At the same time, in demography and the economics of the family, the standard of living of families has always been considered as one of the important factors in the formation of the family and the fertility, affecting the number of children in the family, births postponing and giving up subsequent births, and family stability. The article justifies the urgency of the poverty of families with children reducing problem, since this category of families currently stands at approximately 60% of all poor families in Russia. Existing definitions of poverty and approaches to its measurement, indicators of poverty dynamics, sources and types of statistical data available to researchers for poverty analysis at the regional level are considered, and three types of effects have been  determined: economic effect (growth of purchasing power of families with children, expansion of opportunities for combining work with the family life, incentives for the development of relevant sectors that produce goods and services for families with children); social effect (reduction of social and gender inequality, increasing of starting opportunities for development of children in families with low income) and demographic effect (allowing more families to plan children's births freely and responsibly, realizing their desire to have several children, slowing down the forthcoming birth rate decline, enabling to raise more healthy and educated children).
Keywords:
poverty, low income, families with children, family policies, the concepts of poverty, social policy, social support

Author Biographies

V. V. Yelizarov, Lomonosov Moscow State University
Scientific Head of the Centre for population studies of the Faculty of Economics
A. L. Sinitsa, Lomonosov Moscow State University
Researcher of the Laboratory of economic education of the Faculty of Economics

References

Bol'she poloviny bednyh v Rossii prishlos' na sem'i s det'mi. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/society/06/09/2017/59aff6859a794749b39bc2bb.



Burdjak A. Ja., Popova D.O. Prichiny bednosti semej s det'mi (po rezul'tatam vyborochnogo obsledovanija domohozjajstv Leningradskoj oblasti) // SPJeRO. 2007. № 6. S. 31-56.



Dolja detej v vozraste do 16 (18) let, prozhivajushhih v domashnih hozjajstvah so srednedushevymi denezhnymi dohodami nizhe velichiny prozhitochnogo minimuma. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/population/family/1-2.xlsx.



Dolja maloimushhih domashnih hozjajstv s det'mi v vozraste do 3 let, v obshhej chislennosti domashnih hozjajstv s det'mi v vozraste do 3 let. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/population/family/7-7.xls.



Dolja maloimushhih domashnih hozjajstv s det'mi v vozraste do 16 (18) let v obshhej chislennosti maloimushhih domashnih hozjajstv. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/population/family/1-3.xlsx.



Dolja naselenija, zhivushhego za nacional'noj chertoj bednosti, za god, predshestvujushhij predydushhemu. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://fedstat.ru/indicator/58476.



Dolja naselenija s denezhnymi dohodami nizhe regional'noj velichiny prozhitochnogo minimuma v obshhej chislennosti naselenija sub#ekta RF. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://fedstat.ru/indicator/43713.



Dolja naselenija s raspolagaemymi jekvivalentnymi denezhnymi dohodami nizhe otnositel'noj cherty bednosti (50% ot mediannogo jekvivalentnogo raspolagaemogo denezhnogo dohoda po naseleniju v celom). [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://fedstat.ru/indicator/58805.



Zvereva N.V. Ocenki urovnja zhizni semej po dannym sociologicheskih issledovanij // Uroven' zhizni naselenija regionov Rossii. 2012. № 5. S. 58-62.



Zvereva N.V. Semejnyj dohod i ego ocenki (po dannym sociologo-demograficheskih issledovanij) // Uroven' zhizni naselenija regionov Rossii. 2007. № 5. S. 40-49.



Kalabihina I.E. Nepolnye sem'i: problemy i perspektivy ih reshenija // Sem'ja v Rossii. 1995. №1-2. S. 166-181.



Korchagina I.I. Izmerenie chelovecheskogo potenciala v aspekte ogranichenija dostupa k resursam ego razvitija // Journal of institutional studies. 2012. T. 4. № 1. S. 68-78.



Korchagina I.I., Prokof'eva L.M., Popova R.I., Filonenko Ju.V., Fursa E.V. Nemonetarnoe izmerenie bednosti i social'noj ujazvimosti naselenija Rossii // Narodonaselenie. 2015. № 1. S. 82-94.



Kuchmaeva O.V., Kuchmaev M.G., Petrjakova O.L. Vzaimodejstvie sem'i i obshhestva: osobennosti i perspektivy. M.: GASK, 2012. 210 s.



Ovcharova L.N., Burdjak A.Ja., Pishnjak A.I., Popova D.O., Popova R.I., Rudberg A.M. Dinamika monetarnyh i nemonetarnyh harakteristik urovnja zhizni rossijskih domohozjajstv za gody postsovetskogo razvitija: analiticheskij doklad. Moskva: Fond «Liberal'naja Missija». 2014. 108 s.



Putin V.V. Stroitel'stvo spravedlivosti. Social'naja politika dlja Rossii // Komsomol'skaja pravda, 13 fevralja 2012 g. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.kp.ru/daily/3759/2807793/.



Raspolagaemye resursy domashnih hozjajstv (v srednem na chlena domohozjajstv), v tom chisle imejushhih detej v vozraste do 16 let, iz nih: s 1 rebenkom; 2 det'mi; 3 i bolee det'mi. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/population/family/7-14.xls.



Rzhanicyna L.S. Alimenty v Rossii: analiz problem i strategija v interesah detej. Proekt Instituta jekonomiki RAN. M.: IJe RAN, 2012. 231 s.



Sem'ja v centre social'no-demograficheskoj politiki? O.V. Sinjavskaja (red.). M.: NISP, 2009. 192 s.



Sem'ja, materinstvo i detstvo. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: (http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/population/motherhood/.



Uroven' zhizni. [Jelektronnyj resurs]. URL: (http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/population/level/.



Shabunova A.A., Kalachikova O.N., Leonidova G.V., Smoleva E.O. Jekskljuzija kak kriterij vydelenija social'no ujazvimyh grupp naselenija // Jekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, prognoz. 2016. № 2 (44). S. 29-47.



Abel-Smith B., Townsend P. The poor and the poorest // Occasional papers on social administration. 1965. № 17. London: Bell & Sons.



Analysis of poverty data by small area estimation / M. Pratesi (ed.). New York: John Wiley and sons Ltd, 2016. 420 p.



Baulch B. The new poverty agenda: a disputed consensus. IDS Bulletin. 1996. № 27. P. 1-10.



Colasanto D., Kapteyn A., van der Gaag J. Two subjective definitions of poverty: results from the Wisconsin basic needs study // Journal of human resources. 1984. Vol. 19. № 1. P. 127-137.



Danziger S, van der Gaag J., Taussig M.K., Smolensky E. The direct measurement of welfare levels: how much does it cost to make ends meet? // Review of economics and statistics. 1984. Vol. 66. № 3. P. 500-505.



Goedhart T., Halberstadt V., Kapteyn A., Van Praag B.M.S. The poverty line: concept and measurement // Journal of human resources. 1977. Vol. 12. № 4. P 503-520.



Hagenaars A.J.M., de Vos K. The definition and measurement of poverty // Journal of human resources. 1988. Vol. 23. № 2. P. 211-221.



Orshansky M. Counting the poor: another look at the poverty profile // Social Security Bulletin. 1965. № 28. P. 3-29.



Rainwater L. The lower-class culture and poverty war strategy // On Understanding poverty / D.P. Moynihan (ed.). New York: Basic Books, 1969. P. 229-259.



Rowntree B.S. Poverty: a study of town life. London: Macmillan, 1901. 437 p.



Sen A.K. Poor, relatively speaking. Oxford economic papers. 1983. Vol. 35. № 2. P. 153-169.



Townsend P. Poverty in the United Kingdom. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1979. 1216 p.



Van Praag BM.S., Goedhart T., Kapteyn A. The poverty line. A pilot survey in Europe // Review of economics and statistics. 1980. Vol. 62. № 3. P. 461-465.



Watts H.W. The iso-prop index: an approach to the determination of differential poverty income thresholds // Journal of human resources. 1967. Vol. 2. № 1. P. 3-18.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Yelizarov, V. V., & Sinitsa, A. L. (2018). Poverty of Families with Children: Problems of Definition and Measurement, Regional Characteristics. Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia, 14(2), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.19181/1999-9836-2018-10012