Attitude of Novosibirsk Inhabitants to Fencing of Areas Adjacent to Residential Houses
Research Article
How to Cite
Melnikov M.V. Attitude of Novosibirsk Inhabitants to Fencing of Areas Adjacent to Residential Houses. Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2016. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 94-104. (in Russ.).
Abstract
The paper deals with a practice of fencing of areas adjacent to the residential apartment blocks carried out by residents of these blocks. This subject is not yet studied by Russian sociologists. The paper is based on the analysis of sociologic inquiry of Novosibirsk inhabitants living in adjacent fenced and unfenced blocks. The issues of their attitude to fencing and restrictions in free access to the fenced areas that may be arisen in this connection, as well as of interrelations between residents of fenced and unfenced residential blocks.
Keywords:
fencing of areas adjacent to residential houses, purposes of fencing, fencing efficiency, attitude to restriction in free access, social and physical distance between residents of fenced and unfenced houses
References
1. 1.Benjamin R.Te Gated Community Mentality [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/30/opinion/the-gated-community-mentality.html?_r=0 (дата обращения: 27.05.2015).
2. Dombrovskij, B. T. Filosofiya steny // Vestnik slavyanskikh kul’tur. Tom 20. Vypusk № 2. 2011. S. 88 - 103.
3. Dzhekobs D. Smert’ i zhizn’ bol’shikh amerikanskikh gorodov. M.: Novoe izdatel’stvo, 2011. 460 s.
4. Goodyear S. Do Gated Communities Threaten Society? [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.citylab. com/crime/2012/04/do-gated-communities-threatensociety/1737/ (дата обращения: 27.05.2015).
5. Grant J., Mittelsteadt L. Types of gated communities // Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 2004. Volume 31. P.913-930.
6. Mel’nikov, M. V. Dikhotomiya privatnogo i publichnogo v problematike sotsiologicheskogo znaniya // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. № 12 (62). 2015. CHast’ 4. – S. 123-128.
7. Mel’nikov, M. V. Otnoshenie zhitelej novostroek k razlichnym formam privatizatsii obshhego prostranstva domov // Teoriya i praktika obshhestvennogo razvitiya. 2015. - № 17. – S. 27-30.
8. Nilova, O. E. Moskovskoe kupechestvo kontsa XVIII – pervoj chetverti XIX veka. Sots. aspekty mirovospriyatiya i samosoznaniya. M., 2002. – 252 s.
9. Permilovskaya, А. B. Krest’yanskij dom v kul’ture Russkogo Severa (XIX – nachalo XX veka). – Аrkhangel’sk: Pravda Severa, 2005. – 312 s.
10. Poslovitsy russkogo naroda: sbornik V. I. Dalya.- 2-e izd., stereotip. – M.: Russ. yaz. – Media, 2006. – 814, [2] s
11. Pospelova G. M., Limontov L. YA. Moskovskij dom s vremyon bylykh do nashikh dnej. – 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. – M.: Grifon, 2009. – 272 s.
12. Shipilov, А. V. Russkaya bytovaya kul’tura: pishha, odezhda, zhilishhe (s drevnejshikh vremen do XVIII veka): monografiya. – Voronezh: VGPU, 2007. – 567 s.
13. Sokolov-Mitrich D. Zaboroboj. Chto takoe «syuda nel’zya!» i kak s ehtim borot’sya // Russkij reporter. 2013. № 48 (5- 12 dekabrya). S.22-31
14. Syshhikov, А. D. Leksika krest’yanskogo derevyannogo stroitel’stva: Materialy k slovaryu. – SPb.: Filologicheskij fakul’tet SPbGU, 2006. – 92 s.
15. Tazetdinova, R. R. Informatsionnyj potentsial edinits kontseptosfery ZHILISHHE: Monografiya. – Ufa: RITS BashGU, 2007. – 238 s.
16. Trudolyubov M. Lyudi za zaborom: CHastnoe prostranstvo, vlast’ i sobstvennost’ v Rossii. M.: Novoe izdatel’stvo, 2015. – 246 s.
17. Vereshhagin E. M., Kostomarov V. G. Mirozdanie vne i posredstvom yazyka. V poiskakh novykh putej razvitiya lingvostranovedeniya: gipoteza (logo)ehpistemy. – M., 2002. – 168 s.
2. Dombrovskij, B. T. Filosofiya steny // Vestnik slavyanskikh kul’tur. Tom 20. Vypusk № 2. 2011. S. 88 - 103.
3. Dzhekobs D. Smert’ i zhizn’ bol’shikh amerikanskikh gorodov. M.: Novoe izdatel’stvo, 2011. 460 s.
4. Goodyear S. Do Gated Communities Threaten Society? [Электронный ресурс]. URL: http://www.citylab. com/crime/2012/04/do-gated-communities-threatensociety/1737/ (дата обращения: 27.05.2015).
5. Grant J., Mittelsteadt L. Types of gated communities // Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 2004. Volume 31. P.913-930.
6. Mel’nikov, M. V. Dikhotomiya privatnogo i publichnogo v problematike sotsiologicheskogo znaniya // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. № 12 (62). 2015. CHast’ 4. – S. 123-128.
7. Mel’nikov, M. V. Otnoshenie zhitelej novostroek k razlichnym formam privatizatsii obshhego prostranstva domov // Teoriya i praktika obshhestvennogo razvitiya. 2015. - № 17. – S. 27-30.
8. Nilova, O. E. Moskovskoe kupechestvo kontsa XVIII – pervoj chetverti XIX veka. Sots. aspekty mirovospriyatiya i samosoznaniya. M., 2002. – 252 s.
9. Permilovskaya, А. B. Krest’yanskij dom v kul’ture Russkogo Severa (XIX – nachalo XX veka). – Аrkhangel’sk: Pravda Severa, 2005. – 312 s.
10. Poslovitsy russkogo naroda: sbornik V. I. Dalya.- 2-e izd., stereotip. – M.: Russ. yaz. – Media, 2006. – 814, [2] s
11. Pospelova G. M., Limontov L. YA. Moskovskij dom s vremyon bylykh do nashikh dnej. – 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. – M.: Grifon, 2009. – 272 s.
12. Shipilov, А. V. Russkaya bytovaya kul’tura: pishha, odezhda, zhilishhe (s drevnejshikh vremen do XVIII veka): monografiya. – Voronezh: VGPU, 2007. – 567 s.
13. Sokolov-Mitrich D. Zaboroboj. Chto takoe «syuda nel’zya!» i kak s ehtim borot’sya // Russkij reporter. 2013. № 48 (5- 12 dekabrya). S.22-31
14. Syshhikov, А. D. Leksika krest’yanskogo derevyannogo stroitel’stva: Materialy k slovaryu. – SPb.: Filologicheskij fakul’tet SPbGU, 2006. – 92 s.
15. Tazetdinova, R. R. Informatsionnyj potentsial edinits kontseptosfery ZHILISHHE: Monografiya. – Ufa: RITS BashGU, 2007. – 238 s.
16. Trudolyubov M. Lyudi za zaborom: CHastnoe prostranstvo, vlast’ i sobstvennost’ v Rossii. M.: Novoe izdatel’stvo, 2015. – 246 s.
17. Vereshhagin E. M., Kostomarov V. G. Mirozdanie vne i posredstvom yazyka. V poiskakh novykh putej razvitiya lingvostranovedeniya: gipoteza (logo)ehpistemy. – M., 2002. – 168 s.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Melnikov, M. V. (2016). Attitude of Novosibirsk Inhabitants to Fencing of Areas Adjacent to Residential Houses. Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia, 12(1), 94-104. Retrieved from https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/vcugjournal/article/view/8288
Section
SOCIOLOGY: FROM HISTORY TO THE PRESENT
