Economic development trends and aspects of healthcare reform in Russia under COVID-2019 pandemic
Research Article
How to Cite
Krivenko N.V. Economic development trends and aspects of healthcare reform in Russia under COVID-2019 pandemic. Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2021. Vol. 17. No. 4. P. 503-513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/lsprr.2021.17.4.7 (in Russ.).
Abstract
The article is aimed at studying the state of the Russian economy and health care system before and after the COVID-2019 pandemic, identifying the main trends in the economy and health care, regardless of the pandemic, as well as its impact on the socioeconomic development of the country. The interrelation and mutual influence of the levels of development of the economy and health care of the country is noted. An analysis of the state of the economy and health care system in Russia for 2017–2019 is presented, problems and achievements in the pre-pandemic period are identified. The COVID-2019 pandemic is considered not only from the point of view of a medical manifestation but as a powerful trigger that provoked large-scale socioeconomic changes in the world, as a bifurcation point in world development, requiring states to objectively assess the state of the economy and healthcare, revise the current coordinate system, getting out of the state of uncertainty and choosing promising areas of socioeconomic development. A cross-country analysis of the response of various health systems to the COVID-19 pandemic has shown the advantages of countries with centralized management, health financing, and subordinate sanitary and epidemiological services. Along with the achievements of Russia in the fight against COVID-19, the existing specific problems of the domestic health care system are noted, which negatively affected the preparedness for a pandemic. Analyzed the consequences of the COVID-2019 pandemic for the socio-economic state of countries at the global level. The change in socio-economic indicators in Russia in 2020 compared to 2019 is presented as a result of the consequences of the COVID-2019 pandemic. The main results of the study are to identify the main trends in the development of the economy and the healthcare system in Russia in the context of the ongoing COVID-2019 pandemic, defining the directions of reforming the national healthcare, trajectories of increasing the level of socioeconomic development of the country
Keywords:
COVID-2019 pandemic, cross-country analysis, Russian economy, health care system, consequences, trends, socioeconomic development
References
1. Vinslav Y.B. Economy-2021: Preservation of Fundamental Problems, Imperativeness and Directions of Transformation of Macro-Level Management Models. Russian Economic Journal. 2021. No. 1. P. 3-31. DOI: 10.33983/0130-9757-2021-1-3-31.
2. Dynkin A., Telegina E. Pandemic Shock and the World after Crisis. World Economy and International Relations. 2020. Vol. 64. No. 8. P. 5-16. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-8-5-16.
3. Elizarov V.V. Problems of the implementation of demographic policy for the period up to 2025. IV Russian Economic Congress «REC-2020». Volume XIII. Thematic conference «Demography and pension systems». 21-25 December 2020. Collection of materials сompiled by A.G. Vishnevsky, Yu.M. Gorlin, I.I. Eliseeva, M.A. Klupt, V.V. Yumaguzin. Moscow. 2020. 114 p.
4. Zaikina G.A. Robotic systems in medicine: what should they be? Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2018. Vol. 88. No. 9. P. 785-792. DOI: 10.31857/S086958730001691-8.
5. Kalinin A.M., Zasimova L.S., Kolosnitsyna M.G., Khorkina N.A. Policy of isolation of the population during the COVID-19 pandemic: what strategies are beneficial to the state? Issues of state and municipal management. 2020. No. 4. P. 7-30.
6. Krivenko N.V. The COVID-2019 pandemic in the focus of the problems of foreign and domestic health systems. Sayapin readings: materials of the All-Russian (national) scientific and practical conference. January 22, 2021. Ed by A.A. Burmistrova [and others]; Minestry of Science and Higher education of R.F., Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin. Tambov: Publishing House «Derzhavinsky». 2021. 350 p.
7. Kuzin D. «Black dragon» and management problems. Economic strategies. 2020. Vol. 22. No. 7. P. 70-81. DOI: 10.33917/es-7.173.2020.70-81.
8. Levshukova O.A., Matveev A.S., Pozoyan D.P. Possible consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on the development of the Russian economy. Natural and humanitarian research. 2020. No. 29(3). P. 191-194. DOI: 10.24411/2309-4788-2020-10255.
9. Minakir P.A. Economics of a pandemic: the Russian way. Spatial Economics. 2020. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 7-18. DOI: 10.14530/se.2020.2.007-018.
10. Mityaev D.A. «The Dead Grabs the Alive»: How Much Stagnation in Social Sciences Cost Us. Economic strategies. 2020. Vol. 144. No. 8. P. 72-85. DOI: 10.33917/es-8.174.2020.72-85.
11. Sergeev A.M. On the implementation of state scientific and technical policy in the Russian Federation and the most important achievements obtained by Russian scientists in 2019. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2021. Vol. 91. No. 1. P.7-52. DOI: 10.31857/S0869587321010084.
12. Siluanov A.G. Increasing the potential of the Russian economy in the context of global post-crisis changes. Finance. 2021. No. 6. P. 3-12.
13. Ulumbekova G.E. Proposals for health care reform in the Russian Federation after the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare Management: News. Views. Education. Bulletin of VSHOUZ. 2020. Vol. 6. No. 2. P.9-26. DOI: 10.24411/2411-8621-2020-12001.
14. Ulumbekova G., Ginoyan A., Petrachkov I. The COVID-19 epidemic and the public health response in different countries. Demographic review. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 121-142. DOI: 10.17323/demreview.v7i2.11140.
15. Frenkel A., Tikhomirov B., Sergienko Y., Surkov A. 2020 is a Disastrous Year, but Not Hopeless: Lessons from the Pandemic. Economic strategies. 2021. №2 (176). P. 98-103. DOI: 10.33917/es-2.176.2021.98-103.
16. Chubarova T.V., Sharova M.A. Public policy as a factor influencing the development of the COVID-19 pandemic: conclusions for Russia. Public administration. Electronic bulletin. 2020. No. 83. P. 84-107. DOI: 10.24411 / 2070-1381-2020-10110.
17. Amat F., Arenas A., Falco-Gimeno A., Munoz J. Pandemics Meet Democracy: Experimental Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis in Spain. SocArXiv Papers. 2020. April 6. DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/dkusw.
18. Bouckaert G., Galli D., Kuhlmann S., Reiter R., Van Hecke S. European Coronationalism? A Hot Spot Governing a Pandemic Crisis. Public Administration Review. 2020. Vol. 80. No. 5. P. 765-773. DOI: 10.1111/puar.13242.
19. Forman R., Atun R., McKee M., Mossialos E. 12 Lessons Learned from the Management of the Coronavirus Pandemic. Health Policy. 2020. Vol. 124. No. 6. P. 577-580. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.05.008.
20. Gostin L.O., Wiley L.F. Governmental Public Health Powers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Stay-at-home Orders, Business Closures, And Travel Restrictions. JAMA. 2020. Vol. 323. No. 21. P. 2137-2138. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.5460.
21. Hollander J.E., Carr B.G. Virtually Perfect? Telemedicine for Covid – 19. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2020. No. 82. P. 1679-1681. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp2003539.
22. Huang I.Y.F. Fighting Against COVID-19 through Government Initiatives and Collaborative Governance: Taiwan Experience. Public Administration Review. 2020. Vol. 80. No. 4. P. 665–670. DOI: 10.1111/puar.13239.
23. Shawa R., Kimb Y.-K., Huaa J. Governance, Technology and Citizen Behavior in Pandemic: Lessons from COVID-19 in East Asia. Progress in Disaster Science. 2020. Vol. 6. P. 100090. DOI: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100090.
24. Singh V.K. Lillrank P. Innovations in Healthcare Management. Cost Effective and Sustainable. Productivity Press. 2015. 456 p.
25. Sussman N. Time for Bed(s) Hospital Capacity and Mortality from COVID-19. COVID Economics. 2020. No. 11. P. 116-129.
26. Ting D.S.W., Carin L., Dzau V., Wong T.Y. Digital technology and COVID-19. Nature Medicine. 2020. Vol. 26. No. 4. P. 458-464. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0824-5.
2. Dynkin A., Telegina E. Pandemic Shock and the World after Crisis. World Economy and International Relations. 2020. Vol. 64. No. 8. P. 5-16. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-8-5-16.
3. Elizarov V.V. Problems of the implementation of demographic policy for the period up to 2025. IV Russian Economic Congress «REC-2020». Volume XIII. Thematic conference «Demography and pension systems». 21-25 December 2020. Collection of materials сompiled by A.G. Vishnevsky, Yu.M. Gorlin, I.I. Eliseeva, M.A. Klupt, V.V. Yumaguzin. Moscow. 2020. 114 p.
4. Zaikina G.A. Robotic systems in medicine: what should they be? Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2018. Vol. 88. No. 9. P. 785-792. DOI: 10.31857/S086958730001691-8.
5. Kalinin A.M., Zasimova L.S., Kolosnitsyna M.G., Khorkina N.A. Policy of isolation of the population during the COVID-19 pandemic: what strategies are beneficial to the state? Issues of state and municipal management. 2020. No. 4. P. 7-30.
6. Krivenko N.V. The COVID-2019 pandemic in the focus of the problems of foreign and domestic health systems. Sayapin readings: materials of the All-Russian (national) scientific and practical conference. January 22, 2021. Ed by A.A. Burmistrova [and others]; Minestry of Science and Higher education of R.F., Tambov State University named after G.R. Derzhavin. Tambov: Publishing House «Derzhavinsky». 2021. 350 p.
7. Kuzin D. «Black dragon» and management problems. Economic strategies. 2020. Vol. 22. No. 7. P. 70-81. DOI: 10.33917/es-7.173.2020.70-81.
8. Levshukova O.A., Matveev A.S., Pozoyan D.P. Possible consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on the development of the Russian economy. Natural and humanitarian research. 2020. No. 29(3). P. 191-194. DOI: 10.24411/2309-4788-2020-10255.
9. Minakir P.A. Economics of a pandemic: the Russian way. Spatial Economics. 2020. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 7-18. DOI: 10.14530/se.2020.2.007-018.
10. Mityaev D.A. «The Dead Grabs the Alive»: How Much Stagnation in Social Sciences Cost Us. Economic strategies. 2020. Vol. 144. No. 8. P. 72-85. DOI: 10.33917/es-8.174.2020.72-85.
11. Sergeev A.M. On the implementation of state scientific and technical policy in the Russian Federation and the most important achievements obtained by Russian scientists in 2019. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2021. Vol. 91. No. 1. P.7-52. DOI: 10.31857/S0869587321010084.
12. Siluanov A.G. Increasing the potential of the Russian economy in the context of global post-crisis changes. Finance. 2021. No. 6. P. 3-12.
13. Ulumbekova G.E. Proposals for health care reform in the Russian Federation after the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare Management: News. Views. Education. Bulletin of VSHOUZ. 2020. Vol. 6. No. 2. P.9-26. DOI: 10.24411/2411-8621-2020-12001.
14. Ulumbekova G., Ginoyan A., Petrachkov I. The COVID-19 epidemic and the public health response in different countries. Demographic review. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 121-142. DOI: 10.17323/demreview.v7i2.11140.
15. Frenkel A., Tikhomirov B., Sergienko Y., Surkov A. 2020 is a Disastrous Year, but Not Hopeless: Lessons from the Pandemic. Economic strategies. 2021. №2 (176). P. 98-103. DOI: 10.33917/es-2.176.2021.98-103.
16. Chubarova T.V., Sharova M.A. Public policy as a factor influencing the development of the COVID-19 pandemic: conclusions for Russia. Public administration. Electronic bulletin. 2020. No. 83. P. 84-107. DOI: 10.24411 / 2070-1381-2020-10110.
17. Amat F., Arenas A., Falco-Gimeno A., Munoz J. Pandemics Meet Democracy: Experimental Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis in Spain. SocArXiv Papers. 2020. April 6. DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/dkusw.
18. Bouckaert G., Galli D., Kuhlmann S., Reiter R., Van Hecke S. European Coronationalism? A Hot Spot Governing a Pandemic Crisis. Public Administration Review. 2020. Vol. 80. No. 5. P. 765-773. DOI: 10.1111/puar.13242.
19. Forman R., Atun R., McKee M., Mossialos E. 12 Lessons Learned from the Management of the Coronavirus Pandemic. Health Policy. 2020. Vol. 124. No. 6. P. 577-580. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.05.008.
20. Gostin L.O., Wiley L.F. Governmental Public Health Powers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Stay-at-home Orders, Business Closures, And Travel Restrictions. JAMA. 2020. Vol. 323. No. 21. P. 2137-2138. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.5460.
21. Hollander J.E., Carr B.G. Virtually Perfect? Telemedicine for Covid – 19. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2020. No. 82. P. 1679-1681. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp2003539.
22. Huang I.Y.F. Fighting Against COVID-19 through Government Initiatives and Collaborative Governance: Taiwan Experience. Public Administration Review. 2020. Vol. 80. No. 4. P. 665–670. DOI: 10.1111/puar.13239.
23. Shawa R., Kimb Y.-K., Huaa J. Governance, Technology and Citizen Behavior in Pandemic: Lessons from COVID-19 in East Asia. Progress in Disaster Science. 2020. Vol. 6. P. 100090. DOI: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100090.
24. Singh V.K. Lillrank P. Innovations in Healthcare Management. Cost Effective and Sustainable. Productivity Press. 2015. 456 p.
25. Sussman N. Time for Bed(s) Hospital Capacity and Mortality from COVID-19. COVID Economics. 2020. No. 11. P. 116-129.
26. Ting D.S.W., Carin L., Dzau V., Wong T.Y. Digital technology and COVID-19. Nature Medicine. 2020. Vol. 26. No. 4. P. 458-464. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0824-5.
Article
Received: 12.08.2021
Accepted: 03.12.2021
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Krivenko, N. V. (2021). Economic development trends and aspects of healthcare reform in Russia under COVID-2019 pandemic. Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia, 17(4), 503-513. https://doi.org/10.19181/lsprr.2021.17.4.7
Section
ECONOMIC RESEARCH
