Flexibility = Precarity or Flexibility + Security? The Lost Guarantees of Social Security

  • J. Csoba University of Debrecen csoba.judit@arts.unideb.hu
How to Cite
Csoba J. Flexibility = Precarity or Flexibility + Security? The Lost Guarantees of Social Security. Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2018. Vol. 14. No. 3. P. 18-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/1999-9836-2018-10023

Abstract

The Object of the Study: «Flexicurity Strategy» and Precarious Employment.The Subject of the Study: Profile the Precarious Employment and the Strategy of flexible and non-standard forms of employment (NSFE).The Purpose of the Study: Identifying the characteristics of the “Flexicurity strategy” and the social and economic Impact of the flexible and precarious employment in Europa.The Main Provisions of the Article:Because of the economic and social challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the profound changes in the labour market processes, the risk of being excluded from work and from social goods divided by work is no longer just among the low-skilled, or manual workers today. As unemployment became commonplace, the basic paradigm of the distribution of social goods and the existence of existential security, based on the share of work carried out, is also jeopardized. Following the turn of the millennium, with the spread of flexible forms of employment, social security has been damaged not only for the unemployed but also for a wide range of workers.The «Flexicurity strategy», designed to tackle the employment crisis of the 1990s - aimed to increase employment by using active labor market instruments and flexibility of work, while strengthening state responsibility in providing social guarantees - it seems to have failed. The pillars of social protection have been weakening among workers in recent years, and the precariat and precarious employment and income insecurity have become more and more widely known phenomenon. After all, the question is right: guaranteeing the social security of workers can only be achieved through the reduction of flexible forms of employment or the creation and guarantee of new forms of social security that fit into the 21st century labor market conditions, dictated by the digitized world.
Keywords:
precarity, flexicurity, gig economy, social security

Author Biography

J. Csoba, University of Debrecen
Prof. Dr. habil. Department of Sociology and Social Policy

References

Barbier, J.C.(2010): The Activation of Social Protection for the Last 10 Years: Was It a Complete Failure? Paper presented at the 6th Annual International Policy and Research Conference on Social Security. Luxembourg.



Barbier, J.C. (2012): Tracing the Fate of EU «Social policy»: Changes in Political Discourse from the «Lisbon Strategy» to „Europe 2020” International Labour Review 151 (4) 377-399.



Beck, U. (2009): A munka szép új világa. Belvedere Meridionale, Szeged.



Beveridge, W.H .(1942): Social Insurance and Allied services Presented to Parliament as Command Paper 6404.



Report by Sir William Beveridge (The Beveridge Report) HMSO, London



Bohle, Ph. - Quinlan, M. – Mayhew,C. (2001): The Health and Safety Effects of Job Insecurity: An Evaluation of the Evidence. The Economic and Labour Relation Review (12)1, 32-60 https://doi.org/10.1177/103530460101200104



Bonoli, G. (2003) ‘Social policy through labor markets: understanding national differences in the provision of economic security to wage earners’. Comparative Political Studies (36), pp. 1007–1030.



Bonoli, G. (2012): Active Labour Market Policy and Social Investment: A Changing Relationship In: Morel, N.-



Palier, B.- Palme, J. (eds.): Towards a Social investment Welfare State? Ideas policies and Challenges. Bristol Policy Press, Bristol pp. 181-204.



Brynjolfsson, E. – McAfee, A. (2014): The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W.W. Norton Campany , London-New York.



Butterwegge, Ch.(2015): Hartz IV und die Folgen Auf dem Weg in eine andere Republik? Belitz Juventa, Weinheim und Basel



Codagnone, C.- Abadie, F.- Biagi, F. (2016): The Future of Work in the ‘Sharing Economy’. Market Efficiency and Equitable Opportunities or Unfair Precarisation? Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Science for Policy report by the Joint Research Centre, 2016



COM 2007(359) „A flexicurity közös alapelvei felé: több és jobb munkahelyet rugalmasság és biztonság révén” Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2007



Csoba Judit (2015): Decent work. Bremen: Wiener Verlag für Sozialforschung, 264 p.



Csoba Judit (2017): Gondoskodó állam, aktiváló állam, befektető állam. A foglalkoztatáspolitika és a jóléti modellváltás néhány összefüggése. socio.hu 2017/1. 1-26. DOI: 10.18030/socio.hu.2017.1.1



Devlin, S. (2017): (In)equality in the Digital Society. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.



Eichhorst, Werner (Hrsg.)(2008): Bringing the jobless into work? Experiences with activation schemes in Europe and the US, Springer, Berlin 2008)



Eleveld, A. (2014): The Duty to Work Without a Wage. A Legal Comparison between the Social Assistance



Legislations in Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. European Journal of Social Security 16(3)



Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (1990): The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge, Polity Press.



Esping-Andersen, Gøsta, ed. (1996): Welfare States in Transition. National Adaptions in Global Economies. London, Sage.



Esping-Andersen, G. (1999): Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford, Oxford University Press.



Éber Márk Áron (2017): Rossz fizetés, létbizonytalanság- Terjed a prekariátus. Új Egyenlőség: Társadalom http://ujegyenloseg.hu/rossz-fizetes-letbizonytalansag-itt-a-prekariatus/ (utolsó letöltés: 2018.06.23.)



Ferrera, M., Hemerijck, A. and Rhodes, M. (2001) ‘The Future of Social Europe: Recasting Work and Welfare in the New Economy,’ In Giddens, A. (ed.): The Global Third Way Debate. Cambridge, Polity, pp. 114–133.



Fiszbein, A.-Schady, N.(szerk.) (2009): Conditional Cash Transfers, Reducing Present and Future Poverty. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.



Flexicurity Pathways (2007) Turning hurdles into stepping stones. June 2007. Report by the European Expert Group on Flexicurity



Hemerijck, A. (2013): Changing Welfare States. Oxford University Press



Hemerijck, A. (2017): The Uses of Social Investment. Oxford University Press



Hemerijck, A.-Eichhorst, W.(2009): Whatever Happened to the Bismarckian Welfare State?



From Labor Shedding to Employment-Friendly Reforms



Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor.



ILO (2015): Non-standard forms of employment. Report for discussion at the Meeting of Experts on Non-Standard Forms of Employment. (Geneva, 16–19 February 2015) International Labour Office, Conditions of Work and Equality Department, Geneva, 2015.



ILO (2017): Strengthening Social Protection for the Future of Work. International Labour Office, Geneva.



ILO (2018): World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2018 International Labour Office, Geneva.



Madsen, P.K. (2002): ‘The Danish model of flexicurity: a paradise – with some snakes,’ In Sarfati, H. - Bonoli, G. (eds)(2003): Labour Market and Social Protection Reforms in International Perspective. Aldershot, Ashgate, pp. 243–265.



Mailand, M. – Arnholtz, J. (2015): Formulating European work and employment regulation during the pre-crisis years: Coalition bulding and industrial inertia. Journal of European Social Policy (25). 1pp. 94-209.



Marshall, T.H. (1965): Class, Citizenship and Social Development. Doubleday and Co., New York



Mc’Kinsey (2015): A Labour Market that works. Connecting Talent with Opportunty in the Digital Age https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Featured%20Insights/Employment%20and%20Growth/Connecting%20talent%20with%20opportunity%20in%20the%20digital%20age/MGI%20Online%20talent_A_Labor_Market_That_Works_Executive_%20summary_June%202015.ashx



Moreira, Amilcar-Lodemel, Ivar: Activation or Welfare? Governance and neoliberal convergence Oxford university Press 2014



OECD (1997): The OECD Job Strategy: Making Work Pay:Taxation, Benefits, Employment and Unemployment. OECD, Paris



OECD (2006): Live Longer, Work Longer. Ageing and Employment Policies. OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264035881-en.



OECD (2016) Automation and Independent Work in a Digital Economy, OECD, Paris



Offe, C. (2003): Freiheit, Sicherheit, Effizienz. Spannungen zwischen Gerechtigkeitsnormen für die



Arbeitsmarkt und Wohlfahstsstaat In. Jutta Allmendinger (Hg.) Entstaatlichung und soziale Sicherheit.



Verhandlungen des 31. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Leipzig 2002, Opladen



Piketty,T.(2014): Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Harvard University Press, 2014



PRECARIR (2016) The rise of the dual labour market: fighting precarious employment in the new member states through industrial relations (2014-2016) https://www.dcu.ie/link/current-projects/precarir2014-2016.shtml (utolsó letöltés: 2018.06.11.)



Schmidt, A. 2017. Digital Labour Markets in the Platform Economy - Mapping the Political Challenges of Crowd Work and Gig Work, (Bonn, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung).



Standing, G. (2011): The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London, Bloomsbury Academic.



Tegmark, M. (2018): Élet 3.0. Embernek lenni a mesterséges intelligencia korában. HVG Könyvek, Budapest.



Török Emőke (2014): Munka és társadalom A munka jelentésváltozásai a bérmunkán innen és túl. KGRE/L'Harmattan, Budapest.



Viebrock, E. – Clasen,J. (2009): «Flexicurity and welfare reform: A review» Socio Economic Review 7(2), 2009, pp. 305–331.



Wacquant, L. (2010): Crafting the Neoliberal State: Workfare, Prisonfare , and Social Insecurity Sociological Forum 25(2) pp.197-220.
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:

APA
Csoba, J. (2018). Flexibility = Precarity or Flexibility + Security? The Lost Guarantees of Social Security. Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia, 14(3), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.19181/1999-9836-2018-10023