Some Issues of Transformation of the Sphere of Education and Labor Market and their State Regulation
Research Article
How to Cite
Yakovleva N.G. Some Issues of Transformation of the Sphere of Education and Labor Market and their State Regulation. Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2020. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 76-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/lsprr/2020.16.2.7 (in Russ.).
Abstract
The author analyzes the socioeconomic transformations of the sphere of education at the stage of late capitalism (commercialization, bureaucratization, managerization, financialization). These transformations are due to the marketization of education. It also shows the changing role and place of the state at this stage of development of the capitalist system. The influence of these changes on the social sphere, for example, the sphere of education, is studied. Changes in the labor market are determined and their impact on education. It is concluded that there is a need to adjust the interaction of the labor market and the education sector. The state should be an active participant in this process. The Object of the Study. Changes in the role of the state at the stage of late capitalism. The Subject of the Study. Socio-economic transformations in education at the stage of late capitalism. The Purpose of the Study. From a theoretical point of view, determine the impact of change The Main Provisions of the Article. 1. Modern stage of development of the capitalist system (late capitalism) it is characterized by a neoliberal model of market economy. It is characterized by market fundamentalism and reduced budget financing of the social sphere, the global hegemony of financial capital and the globalization of all spheres of human activity. 2. The market economy of late capitalism is characterized by the marketization of the social sphere, in particular, education. 3. In the market economy of late capitalism, the place and role of the state is changing. 4. The social sphere becomes the main sector in the structure of the economy at the stage of late capitalism, since it is in it that the main productive force of society is formed - the creative potential of a person. 5. In Russia in the field of education observed the regressive trends which have an impact on the labour market. 6. In turn, there are changes in the labor market that require a certain response from the education sector. 7. At the stage of late capitalism, it is necessary to adjust the interaction of the labor market and the education sector. The state should be directly involved in this.
Keywords:
late capitalism, market economy, a state, education.
References
1. Bobkov V.N. Gibkaya zanyatost' put' k khaosu ili novaya model' ustojchivosti rynkov truda // Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii, 2018. Tom. 14. № 3. C. 7-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1999-9836-2018-10022.
2. Bodrunov S.D. Noonomika /Monografiya/ – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2018. – 432 s.
3. Buzgalin А.V. Pozdnij kapitalizm i ego predely: dialektika proizvoditel'nykh sil i proizvodstvennykh otnoshenij // Voprosy politicheskoj ehkonomii, 2018, №2. S. 10-38.
4. Buzgalin А.V., Kolganov А.I. Transformatsii sotsial'noj struktury pozdnego kapitalizma: ot proletariata i burzhuazii k prekariatu i kreativnomu klassu? // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2019. № 1. S. 18–28. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250003744-1.
5. Buzgalin А.V., Kolganov А.I. Gosudarstvo v ehkonomike XXI veka: politiko- ehkonomicheskaya interpretatsiya // Аl'ternativy, 2020, №1. S. 4-35.
6. Butenko V., Polunin K. Rossiya 2025: ot kadrov k talantam. [EHlektronnyj resurs] - Rezhim dostupa: http://d-russia.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/.
7. Voejkov M.I. Gosudarstvo kak predmet politehkonomicheskogo izucheniya // Voprosy politicheskoj ehkonomii. 2018. №1. S. 35-55.
8. Klejner G.B. Gosudarstvo dolzhno uchityvat' interesy vsekh chlenov obshhestva // Voprosy politicheskoj ehkonomii, 2020, №1 (21). S. 105-111. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3753348.
9. Kolganov А.I. Budushhee gosudarstva v ehkonomike: rossijskie diskussii i ikh mezhdunarodnyj kontekst // EHkonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoj Rossii. 2019;86(3), S. 18-29. https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2019-3(86)-18-29.
10. Lenchuk E.B. Global'nye problemy i vyzovy obuslovlivayut vozrastanie ehkonomicheskoj roli gosudarstva // Voprosy politicheskoj ehkonomii, 2020, №1 (21). C. 112-119. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3753354.
11. Marks K. Kapital. T. 2. M.: Politicheskaya literatura, 1984.
12. Marks K. Kapital. T. 4. M.: Politicheskaya literatura, 1984.
13. Marks K., EHngel's F. Sochineniya. Izd. 2-e.
14. Na puti k novoj ehkonomicheskoj teorii gosudarstva / Pod red. А.YA. Rubinshtejna. – M.: Institut ehkonomiki RАN, 2018. – 110 c.
15. Ovsyannikov А.А., Lakeeva L.V. Rassoglasovannost' rynka truda i sistemy professional'noj orientatsii v Rossii // Narodonaselenie, 2019. Tom. 22. № 4. C. 62-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1561-7785-2019-00039.
16. Odegov YU. G., Garnov А.P. Reforma rossijskogo obrazovaniya: problemy, rezul'taty, perspektivy // Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii, 2019. Tom. 15. № 3. C. 36-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1999-9836-2019-10071.
17. Osipov А.M. Rynochnye mekhanizmy – sotsial'nyj tupik rossijskogo obrazovaniya // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2019. T. 28. № 5. S. 63-72.
18. Ryazanov V.T. Kapitalizm i krizisy: stanovlenie i razvitie politiko-ehkonomicheskogo podkhoda // Voprosy politicheskoj ehkonomii, 2015, №1. S. 48-64.
19. Smolin O.N. Sistemnye problemy obrazovaniya v Rossii i puti ikh preodoleniya / Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnogo Kongressa «Vozrozhdenie proizvodstva, nauki i obrazovaniya v Rossii: vyzovy i resheniya» / Pod obshh. red. S.D. Bodrunova. M.: LENАND, 2015, S. 47-52.
20. Sorokin D.E. Glavnaya zadacha gosudarstva – obespechenie prioritetnogo razvitiya tekhnologij i sotsial'noj spravedlivosti // Voprosy politicheskoj ehkonomii, 2020, №1 (21). C. 120-129. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3753359.
21. Fajn B. Finansializatsiya: marksistskij vzglyad // Voprosy politicheskoj ehkonomii, 2019, №1. S. 34-50.
22. Shichkin I.А. Sostoyanie, masshtaby i napravleniya snizheniya neustojchivoj zanyatosti trudyashhikhsya-migrantov v Rossii // Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii, 2018. Tom. 14. № 3. C. 38-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1999-9836-2018-10026.
23. Yakovleva N.G. Kommertsializatsiya, byurokratizatsiya, menedzherizatsiya obrazovaniya postsovetskoj Rossii: politehkonomicheskij vzglyad // Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya. 2017. №3. S. 122-131.
24. Yakovleva N.G. Obrazovanie v Rossii: obshhestvennoe blago ili kommercheskaya usluga? // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2018. № 3. S. 149-153. DOI: 10.7868/S0132162518030182.
25. Yakovleva N.G. Sotsial'nye posledstviya finansializatsii obrazovaniya // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2019. № 12. S. 104-114. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250007744-1.
26. Amin S. Maldevelopment: Anatomy of a Global Failure. Pambazuka Press. 1990.
27. Fine B. Locating Financialization. Historical Materialism, 2018, No. 2: 97–116.
28. Jameson F. Postmodernism or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. . London – New York: Verso, 1991.
29. Mandel E. Late Capitalism. London – New York: Verso, 1987.
30. Wallerstein, I. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction, London: Duke University Press, 2004.
2. Bodrunov S.D. Noonomika /Monografiya/ – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2018. – 432 s.
3. Buzgalin А.V. Pozdnij kapitalizm i ego predely: dialektika proizvoditel'nykh sil i proizvodstvennykh otnoshenij // Voprosy politicheskoj ehkonomii, 2018, №2. S. 10-38.
4. Buzgalin А.V., Kolganov А.I. Transformatsii sotsial'noj struktury pozdnego kapitalizma: ot proletariata i burzhuazii k prekariatu i kreativnomu klassu? // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2019. № 1. S. 18–28. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250003744-1.
5. Buzgalin А.V., Kolganov А.I. Gosudarstvo v ehkonomike XXI veka: politiko- ehkonomicheskaya interpretatsiya // Аl'ternativy, 2020, №1. S. 4-35.
6. Butenko V., Polunin K. Rossiya 2025: ot kadrov k talantam. [EHlektronnyj resurs] - Rezhim dostupa: http://d-russia.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/.
7. Voejkov M.I. Gosudarstvo kak predmet politehkonomicheskogo izucheniya // Voprosy politicheskoj ehkonomii. 2018. №1. S. 35-55.
8. Klejner G.B. Gosudarstvo dolzhno uchityvat' interesy vsekh chlenov obshhestva // Voprosy politicheskoj ehkonomii, 2020, №1 (21). S. 105-111. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3753348.
9. Kolganov А.I. Budushhee gosudarstva v ehkonomike: rossijskie diskussii i ikh mezhdunarodnyj kontekst // EHkonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoj Rossii. 2019;86(3), S. 18-29. https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2019-3(86)-18-29.
10. Lenchuk E.B. Global'nye problemy i vyzovy obuslovlivayut vozrastanie ehkonomicheskoj roli gosudarstva // Voprosy politicheskoj ehkonomii, 2020, №1 (21). C. 112-119. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3753354.
11. Marks K. Kapital. T. 2. M.: Politicheskaya literatura, 1984.
12. Marks K. Kapital. T. 4. M.: Politicheskaya literatura, 1984.
13. Marks K., EHngel's F. Sochineniya. Izd. 2-e.
14. Na puti k novoj ehkonomicheskoj teorii gosudarstva / Pod red. А.YA. Rubinshtejna. – M.: Institut ehkonomiki RАN, 2018. – 110 c.
15. Ovsyannikov А.А., Lakeeva L.V. Rassoglasovannost' rynka truda i sistemy professional'noj orientatsii v Rossii // Narodonaselenie, 2019. Tom. 22. № 4. C. 62-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1561-7785-2019-00039.
16. Odegov YU. G., Garnov А.P. Reforma rossijskogo obrazovaniya: problemy, rezul'taty, perspektivy // Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii, 2019. Tom. 15. № 3. C. 36-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1999-9836-2019-10071.
17. Osipov А.M. Rynochnye mekhanizmy – sotsial'nyj tupik rossijskogo obrazovaniya // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2019. T. 28. № 5. S. 63-72.
18. Ryazanov V.T. Kapitalizm i krizisy: stanovlenie i razvitie politiko-ehkonomicheskogo podkhoda // Voprosy politicheskoj ehkonomii, 2015, №1. S. 48-64.
19. Smolin O.N. Sistemnye problemy obrazovaniya v Rossii i puti ikh preodoleniya / Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnogo Kongressa «Vozrozhdenie proizvodstva, nauki i obrazovaniya v Rossii: vyzovy i resheniya» / Pod obshh. red. S.D. Bodrunova. M.: LENАND, 2015, S. 47-52.
20. Sorokin D.E. Glavnaya zadacha gosudarstva – obespechenie prioritetnogo razvitiya tekhnologij i sotsial'noj spravedlivosti // Voprosy politicheskoj ehkonomii, 2020, №1 (21). C. 120-129. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3753359.
21. Fajn B. Finansializatsiya: marksistskij vzglyad // Voprosy politicheskoj ehkonomii, 2019, №1. S. 34-50.
22. Shichkin I.А. Sostoyanie, masshtaby i napravleniya snizheniya neustojchivoj zanyatosti trudyashhikhsya-migrantov v Rossii // Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii, 2018. Tom. 14. № 3. C. 38-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/1999-9836-2018-10026.
23. Yakovleva N.G. Kommertsializatsiya, byurokratizatsiya, menedzherizatsiya obrazovaniya postsovetskoj Rossii: politehkonomicheskij vzglyad // Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya. 2017. №3. S. 122-131.
24. Yakovleva N.G. Obrazovanie v Rossii: obshhestvennoe blago ili kommercheskaya usluga? // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2018. № 3. S. 149-153. DOI: 10.7868/S0132162518030182.
25. Yakovleva N.G. Sotsial'nye posledstviya finansializatsii obrazovaniya // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2019. № 12. S. 104-114. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250007744-1.
26. Amin S. Maldevelopment: Anatomy of a Global Failure. Pambazuka Press. 1990.
27. Fine B. Locating Financialization. Historical Materialism, 2018, No. 2: 97–116.
28. Jameson F. Postmodernism or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. . London – New York: Verso, 1991.
29. Mandel E. Late Capitalism. London – New York: Verso, 1987.
30. Wallerstein, I. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction, London: Duke University Press, 2004.
Article
Received: 28.04.2020
Accepted: 15.06.2020
Citation Formats
Other cite formats:
APA
Yakovleva, N. G. (2020). Some Issues of Transformation of the Sphere of Education and Labor Market and their State Regulation. Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia, 16(2), 76-82. https://doi.org/10.19181/lsprr/2020.16.2.7
Section
SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH
